I am a lady who likes words. I like the way they sound, I like the way they taste…actually, that’s not true. Some words, I do not like. But I feel pretty strongly in either direction about words, which is what it is.
Words are powerful things. Aside from the infinite poetic lyrical communicative rhythmic possibilities, words can Make. Shit. Happen. (They can also stop things from happening, which is the same thing.)
Back in the day, the pre-”written word” day, a word was a contract. There was no literal contract to sign: words were it. I say I am going to trade this cow for your daughter, that means I am going to do it. In Elizabethan England, culture as a whole was in the midst of the transition from oral to literate, and we can glean from Shakespeare’s characters just how weighty words were considered to be. If you swore something, if you cursed someone, that was for realsies, no take-backs. That particular culture linked a great heaping chunk of their verbal accountability to the idea of Hell, as in, “I curse you to hell” or “I didn’t do what I swore I would do so i am going to hell,” but that was not always the case. In general, people just didn’t say things they didn’t mean, because there was no external, secondary means of validating what was spoken.
Before that, the Greeks were arguing left and write (HAH) about the written word. Plato never wrote any of his ideas down; the only reason we can study him nowadays is because his followers recorded his teachings. (Makes me think of people who write emails about how technology is ruining everything.)
Then you have the Thai language, which is structured without a subjunctive tense. There is no “I would have” or “Maybe I will” in Thai. You say it, you do it. Or, you don’t say it. Bam.
Now, we’ve got 2 layers seperating us from what we say. Used to be the said and the unsaid, then it was the written, the said but not written and the unsaid. But, along came the internet, and now the hierarchy goes like this:
4) (least vaild) the unspoken
3) the said
2) the written
1) the internetted!
Because now, accessibility is key and if your set of Encyclopedia Britannicas only share their knowledge with people in the room and do not also share it with someone across the planet, their power and validity is diminished. Oh, there are those who will say that Wikipedia’s validity is compromised by its flexibility and accessibility, but in fact the opposite is true. Who’s winning now, Encyclopedias on the shelf in a room? Hmmm? Who? Not you!
BUT. In all of this, all the layers and hierarchies and important things and unimportant ones, I think something is lost. And that is, the power of words. Words can harm, words can heal. A well-placed, well-timed set of words can get you laid, or just really really hurt someone you care about. Words hold such charge; they are still the number-one way to talk to people, outshining smoke signals and interpretive dance year after year at the Communication Olympics.
Spoken words carry tone and expression that the written word cannot compete with. With the spoken word comes the presence of a person; it is a lot harder to invalidate something you have said out loud than something you have written, because what you say comes directly from you. There is no, “Oh, I wrote that when I was angry, just venting, had to get it out, didn’t mean it.” The written page and the internet are both media; they are intermediaries between our thoughts and the people we are communicating with. But what we say out loud is visceral, it is vibrational, it is connected to our bodies. And, despite the best efforts of mainstream Western culture, bodies are still the number-one place people live, outshining cryogenic freezing units and computerized robot avatars year after year at the Soul-Holding Olympics.
So, bodies hold meaning and emotions, and the sounds bodies make are a big deal. A well-placed sigh can, again, help you while getting laid or totally hurt someone’s feelings. Words are filtered through the emotions we hold in our bodies, and the sounds we make when we speak are a big part of why the spoken word holds so much charge.
Recently, in an almost cinematically (or Shakespearean) unrealistic turn of events, I was talking shit about someone I care about, and this person heard the whole thing. I have known this person for a long time and consider her to be one of my closest friends, but something has happened earlier in the day that had triggered some really strong emotions for me, and I was talking. some. shit. I am realizing as I write this that part of what enables me to talk such elaborate, extensive shit is my close relationship to words. I can go on and on because I keep finding new ways to use my verbosity to re-explain the same thing. Sucks if the person overhears while that is happening. Because, while I didn’t really mean some of the things I said, I still said them.
And then again, when something hurtful is said, what do you do, say “sorry”? That’s just another word. Write a letter? Same issue.
I am going to return to the hierarchy I outlined, where “unspoken” was the lowest. Perhaps that hierarchy is wrong. Maybe “unspoken” is actually the highest, purest form of communication. I know that now, my unspoken (though now written, and internetted) message toward this person is one of contrition, and that is less immediate than saying it out loud but perhaps it is the most powerful. The unspoken lacks the immediacy of something that is said, but it is what is Really Going On, no media, no translation.
That’s it. No more words.