The Laws of Attraction

By savagenie

Alright, people. This one is going to get a bit autobiographical, but hang in there. I am going to make it worth your while.

Back when I was but a young, pimply, angst-filled youth of about fifteen, I felt like breaking the rules was pretty much the way to go. Almost any rule, for almost any reason. One of the rules to which I responded with particular distaste was the rules of dating. Primp yourself to death and be naturally endowed with the kinds of hormones than make your tits big (not the kinds that compromise your skin tone, let’s say…or make you burst out in tears during math class.) Then, let the whole affair unfold bit by bit, as he notices you, he decides to make a move, you flirt a little bit but not too much, and then eventually, you get the privilege of allowing him to pressure you into sex, preferably in the back of a car. (Your mother’s or his, doesn’t matter.)

I thought to myself, Hey! What a waste of time and energy! Life’s too short! So I developed a crush on a boy whose identity shall be protected (except to say that his name was Ray Martinez) and promptly told him, outright, that i liked him, no bullshit. The conversation went something like this:

Me: Hey, ahh, Ray…could I talk to you for a minute?

Ray: (takes a swig from his bottle of Mountain Dew) uh, sure..

Me: I just wanted to let you know that I think you’re pretty cool, and anyway I am attracted to you and..yeah, I guess that’s it.

Ray: uh.

Me: Ok, well, seeya later!

Ray: (silence.)

Now, I have no desire to blame Ray for the fact that a romance did not blossom from that exchange. I have since gone to the opposite extreme in my thinking, telling my (equally vocal, though perhaps not as forward) friends, ” The most attractive thing you can show a man is your back, as you walk away. Nothing is a more powerful aphrodisiac than rejection. Treat ‘em like shit. They LOVE it.” This method, let’s call it the “Mean” Method (as opposed to the above “Open Method”) developed from the repeated experience that the ones I like never like me, and vice versa. I realized: it is not because I am only worthy of people to whom I am not attracted, but because everyone (not just men, now) is wired to want what they can’t have. This is one of the most trusted pop-psychology principles, but it is also simple economics.

So where does this leave us? Do we merely settle for those we don’t really like, because we know they like us? OR…Do We Play Games.

You may have guessed from my punctuation that I am leaning towards the second one. But Playing Games is NOT the same as “mind-fucking.” Mind-fucking is sadistically toying with someone because of the pleasure you gain from watching them writhe in desire. Games, on the other hand, are actually kind of fun. Games allow you to gain a better understanding of who the person is, and they allow you to develop a rapport, maybe even…a relationship? Games are a gentle way to build something, and to give it the time and space it needs to grow on its own. I would be the first to admit that it is a bit safer than just sticking your neck out there, or your cock out there or whatever but maybe that’s ok. Cause anyway, nothing worth having comes too easily (or quickly. heh. double-entendre that one all you want, baby.)

4 Responses to “The Laws of Attraction”

  1. rosie Says:

    You could write a book on games and call it something like “The Games We Play” and on the cover it’ll have you with a pen behind your ear leaning against a wall with your arms crossed, oh so matter-of-factly. That would be, amaaazing! I’m pretty sure you’re an expert on the games topic now. I know who to turn to when I want to play games with someone and be a major pro at it.

    PS I like your approach to Ray Martinez. Sounds like something I would do, except when I run away I’d trip on something and skid my face and start crying in a loud and humiliating way, haha.

  2. Tara Says:

    so are you going to reveal who you may be playing this game with?? hee….

    also when/where is this play you are going to be in? your public wants to know. please post info!

  3. savagenie Says:

    thanks for asking chicadee…

    Bacchae 3.0

    this weekend and next

    may 30,31, june 1
    june 6,7,8
    all at 8PM

    at CUE in Oakland 1824 5th street

  4. Mireille Says:

    HI Vengi! I just happened to click my way all the way over here. Ok, check the time, can’t be late for my exam in an hour (seeing as for the last one i already got the rooms mixed up and therefore had an embarassing late entrance). But to the point now: i know you’re a fan of playing games, and you’re probably right, but i just refuse to believe that it always has to be like that. Because sometimes I just CANNOT find the energy to go through that whole thing, and even if you do, you’re still putting energy into a something that might not ever happen. i recently tried out the kamikaze, or ‘open’ method, as you call it. Not necessarily succesful, but i find it very liberating. I think i’ll try it again sometime, but then i’ll spend more time thinking up what i’ll say (rather than going over there and saying, you know what- you’re too tall for me…) The thing is, i’m proud of myself for having done it, and so are my friends apparantly. They keep telling me how great that is, and how they admire the courage.
    So i’d like to be the advocate for this method, and i’d like to encourage everyone to just try it out once, because it’s easier than it sounds.
    bye (have fun on camp- i’ll write..)

Leave a Reply